Tuesday, November 8, 2016

Exclusion of women in irrigation schemes


The aim of this post is to provide a brief insight into women’s water needs for productive activities, such as irrigation, looking beyond the reproductive, domestic activities. The post will begin by exploring women’s need for water for both productive and reproductive activities. Secondly, it will discuss the link between land and water rights. Finally, the major impediments in inclusionary irrigation will be briefly discussed.

Productive and reproductive activities

In many parts of Africa, women are expected to take responsibility for domestic tasks while the males perform the role of breadwinners. Therefore, it is assumed that working in a farm is a masculine job. Men are seen as the main farmers, while women are expected as merely assist as a secondary farmer, in addition to doing the housework (Zwarteveen,1997). So a woman’s interest and need for water is often confined to the domestic domain.  Some agencies may use this narrow focus as a basis for the allocation of water and so help reinforce the idea of women as housekeepers and therefore disregard their potential for production activities (Rathgeber, 1996).


However, women have always used water for both household use and productive farming activities. In many rural female-headed households, women will work in farms as the sole providers for the family. For example, Schaap et al (1994, cited in Van Koppen, 1998) found that widows in Niger relied solely on irrigated faming for their livelihood. Furthermore, in poorer areas where the man’s income is not enough to sustain the family, women are required to work in farms and contribute to the financial running of the household (Van Koppen, 1998). So like men, women also have an interest in accessing an managing water for irrigation

Land and water rights

Another, important factor that hinders women’s participation in productive irrigation activities is women’s lack of land rights. In many countries in Africa, land right is generally a precursor for water right. Women don’t usually own land and when they are involved in farming practices, it is often in their husband’s or fathers land. This puts them in a vulnerable position as any change in position of their relationships (for example, separation or divorce) with her husband could result in her land access being taken away(IFAD,2007). In addition, without land rights, it becomes difficult, if not impossible to get memberships to water user associations or credit for agriculture. As a consequence, women are reduced to a secondary participant with little or no control over water management.

So what can be done?

1)    First and foremost, I feel that it is important to categorise women beyond the domestic sphere and agencies should recognise their potential as productive and effective farmers.
2)    Secondly, effective targeting and prioritising allocation to women-  land and water rights should be allocated on a needs-based analysis Van Koppen, 1998). Furthermore, plots given to women should be the same size as those provide to men In a small-scale rice irrigation schemes in central Burkino Faso, women were given the rights to 0.5 out of 50 land plots (Projet Sensibilisation, 1993).
3)    Furthermore, the number of women on the scheme should be representative of the local population. Secondly, women need to be involved in the decision making process – ensuring these schemes are not only gender aware but participatory (see blog 2).
4)    Women’s land rights should be protected - once land and water rights have been allocated, the women should be provided with legal protection to maintain her rights (IFAD,2007).
5)    Rights for non-land users- irrigation agencies need to extend water rights beyond land owners to include land users to (IFAD,2007)










IFAD, 2007. Gender and water: securing water for improved rural livelihoods. Rome: IFAD.

Projet Sensibilisation et Formation, 1993. Attribution des parcelles aux femmes dans les périmètres en aval des barrages: Possibilités et limites
Projet Sensibilisation et Formation des Paysans Autour Des Barrages, Ouagadougou (1993)

Rathgeber, E., 1996. Women, men, and water-resource management in Africa. Water management in Africa and the Middle East: Challenges and opportunities. Rached E., Rathgeber EM and Brooks D.(eds). International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Canada, pp.49-69.

Van Koppen, B., 1998. Water rights, gender, and poverty alleviation. Inclusion and exclusion of women and men smallholders in public irrigation infrastructure development. Agriculture and Human Values, 15(4), pp.361-374.


Zwarteveen, M.Z., 1997. Water: From basic need to commodity: A discussion on gender and water rights in the context of irrigation. World development, 25(8), pp.1335-1349.

3 comments:

  1. "Some agencies may use this narrow focus as a basis for the allocation of water and so help reinforce the idea of women as housekeepers and therefore disregard their potential for production activities"

    Regarding this comment, it made me think about the important role that external project managers such as NGOs and government agencies have to close the gender gap in the communities they work with.
    If the project is able to give the women the importance they should have then this will be a little step towards reducing inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, it has also been proven in many cases that when women are taken into account, the project is more likely to succeed.
    Maybe you could go more in deep about this comparing projects where women is and isn't taken into account as part of the irrigation programs and analyse the differences between them.

    If you want to give it a look the following article talks about access to energy of small-scale farmers and it points out that "if women generally had the same access to productive resources as men – including energy and equipment – they could increase yields on their farms by 20–30 per cent".
    This can be a starting point for your research
    http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16562IIED.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an excellent comment. In my own work in Niger and Nigeria, despite our best efforts, we have found it difficult - mostly I think for cultural reasons - to increase the participation of women in decision-making about water. Have a look at this photo from a recent stakeholder engagement workshop: http://grofutures.org/article/grofutures-launch-in-transboundary-iullemmeden-basin/
    So, I do see our role with significant external influence including the UK government (substantial local involvement aside) to influence and promote women's participation in discussions and decision-making over water.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you Maria and Richard for your insightful comments. Yes, I do feel that external agencies have the means to promote and facilitate more inclusive and participatory schemes. They can do this through funding, education and training.

    I think one of the most important things when making a project more inclusive is effective targeting. Gender shouldn't be be an add on but should be considered in the planning stages. The Lutheran World Relief (LWR) shows a good example of this where they targeted specific women in their vegetable farming scheme because women ususally do not hold legal land and water rights; and because farming is seen as a masculine domain. So targeting women prior and throughout the scheme is important if external actors are to promote women's participation in resource management.

    Please take a look at my most recent post where I explore the LWR's work in Bihar, India to show how external actors can help facilitate inclusive projects.

    ReplyDelete