Exclusion of women in irrigation schemes
The aim of
this post is to provide a brief insight into women’s water needs for productive
activities, such as irrigation, looking beyond the reproductive, domestic activities. The
post will begin by exploring women’s need for water for both productive and reproductive
activities. Secondly, it will discuss the link between land and water rights.
Finally, the major impediments in inclusionary irrigation will be briefly discussed.
Productive and reproductive activities
In many
parts of Africa, women are expected to take responsibility for domestic tasks while
the males perform the role of breadwinners. Therefore, it is assumed that
working in a farm is a masculine job. Men are seen as the main farmers, while
women are expected as merely assist as a secondary farmer, in addition to doing
the housework (Zwarteveen,1997). So a woman’s interest and need for water is often
confined to the domestic domain. Some
agencies may use this narrow focus as a basis for the allocation of water and
so help reinforce the idea of women as housekeepers and therefore disregard their
potential for production activities (Rathgeber, 1996).
However,
women have always used water for both household use and productive farming
activities. In many rural female-headed households, women will work in farms as
the sole providers for the family. For example, Schaap et al (1994, cited in Van Koppen, 1998) found that
widows in Niger relied solely on irrigated faming for their livelihood. Furthermore,
in poorer areas where the man’s income is not enough to sustain the family,
women are required to work in farms and contribute to the financial running of
the household (Van Koppen, 1998). So like men, women also have an interest in
accessing an managing water for irrigation
Land and water
rights
Another, important
factor that hinders women’s participation in productive irrigation activities
is women’s lack of land rights. In many countries in Africa, land right is
generally a precursor for water right. Women don’t usually own land and when
they are involved in farming practices, it is often in their husband’s or
fathers land. This puts them in a vulnerable position as any change in position
of their relationships (for example, separation or divorce) with her husband
could result in her land access being taken away(IFAD,2007). In addition, without
land rights, it becomes difficult, if not impossible to get memberships to
water user associations or credit for agriculture. As a consequence, women are reduced
to a secondary participant with little or no control over water management.
So what can be done?
1) First and foremost, I feel that it
is important to categorise women beyond the domestic sphere and agencies should
recognise their potential as productive and effective farmers.
2) Secondly, effective targeting and
prioritising allocation to women- land
and water rights should be allocated on a needs-based analysis Van Koppen, 1998).
Furthermore, plots given to women should be the same size as those provide to
men In a small-scale rice irrigation schemes in central Burkino Faso, women
were given the rights to 0.5 out of 50 land plots (Projet Sensibilisation, 1993).
3) Furthermore, the number of women on
the scheme should be representative of the local population. Secondly, women
need to be involved in the decision making process – ensuring these schemes are
not only gender aware but participatory (see blog 2).
4) Women’s land rights should be
protected - once land and water rights have been allocated, the women should be
provided with legal protection to maintain her rights (IFAD,2007).
5) Rights for non-land users- irrigation
agencies need to extend water rights beyond land owners to include land users
to (IFAD,2007)
IFAD, 2007. Gender and water: securing water for improved rural livelihoods. Rome: IFAD.
Projet
Sensibilisation et Formation, 1993. Attribution des parcelles aux femmes dans
les périmètres en aval des barrages: Possibilités et limites
Projet
Sensibilisation et Formation des Paysans Autour Des Barrages, Ouagadougou
(1993)
Rathgeber, E., 1996. Women, men, and water-resource management in Africa. Water management in Africa and the Middle East: Challenges and opportunities. Rached E., Rathgeber EM and Brooks D.(eds). International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Canada, pp.49-69.
Rathgeber, E., 1996. Women, men, and water-resource management in Africa. Water management in Africa and the Middle East: Challenges and opportunities. Rached E., Rathgeber EM and Brooks D.(eds). International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Canada, pp.49-69.
Van Koppen,
B., 1998. Water rights, gender, and poverty alleviation. Inclusion and exclusion
of women and men smallholders in public irrigation infrastructure development. Agriculture and Human Values, 15(4),
pp.361-374.
Zwarteveen,
M.Z., 1997. Water: From basic need to commodity: A discussion on gender and
water rights in the context of irrigation. World
development, 25(8), pp.1335-1349.
"Some agencies may use this narrow focus as a basis for the allocation of water and so help reinforce the idea of women as housekeepers and therefore disregard their potential for production activities"
ReplyDeleteRegarding this comment, it made me think about the important role that external project managers such as NGOs and government agencies have to close the gender gap in the communities they work with.
If the project is able to give the women the importance they should have then this will be a little step towards reducing inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, it has also been proven in many cases that when women are taken into account, the project is more likely to succeed.
Maybe you could go more in deep about this comparing projects where women is and isn't taken into account as part of the irrigation programs and analyse the differences between them.
If you want to give it a look the following article talks about access to energy of small-scale farmers and it points out that "if women generally had the same access to productive resources as men – including energy and equipment – they could increase yields on their farms by 20–30 per cent".
This can be a starting point for your research
http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16562IIED.pdf
This is an excellent comment. In my own work in Niger and Nigeria, despite our best efforts, we have found it difficult - mostly I think for cultural reasons - to increase the participation of women in decision-making about water. Have a look at this photo from a recent stakeholder engagement workshop: http://grofutures.org/article/grofutures-launch-in-transboundary-iullemmeden-basin/
ReplyDeleteSo, I do see our role with significant external influence including the UK government (substantial local involvement aside) to influence and promote women's participation in discussions and decision-making over water.
Thank you Maria and Richard for your insightful comments. Yes, I do feel that external agencies have the means to promote and facilitate more inclusive and participatory schemes. They can do this through funding, education and training.
ReplyDeleteI think one of the most important things when making a project more inclusive is effective targeting. Gender shouldn't be be an add on but should be considered in the planning stages. The Lutheran World Relief (LWR) shows a good example of this where they targeted specific women in their vegetable farming scheme because women ususally do not hold legal land and water rights; and because farming is seen as a masculine domain. So targeting women prior and throughout the scheme is important if external actors are to promote women's participation in resource management.
Please take a look at my most recent post where I explore the LWR's work in Bihar, India to show how external actors can help facilitate inclusive projects.