A lotus grows in the mud
Successful gender-inclusive schemes
Maria and Richard left some insightful comments on my previous posts regarding the external actors such as NGOs and government agencies and how their roles are important when it comes to including women in water management.
Richard directed me to the following picture:
Photo credit: Grofutures |
This picture is symbolic of many of the water management schemes
across Africa – there is evidently lack of women in water management. This post
will explore what has been done and can be done by external agents to facilitate
participation through financial and educational support. This post will look at
a women-led vegetable farming project through the assistance of Lutheran World
Relief(LWR) to show what a successful scheme looks like. The vegetable- farming
project works with 500 female farmers in Bihar to participate in vegetable farming
by teaching them innovative farming techniques, such as using poly-houses that
provide perfect conditions for seedlings to grow.
One of the main characteristics of the scheme is effective
targeting and prioritization – the project is led by women for women. The
supports women in poor women in rural Bihar, including Dalit women who are
often marginalized in society. This kind of targeting is important because agriculture
is usually seen as masculine and secondly because many women in these
communities do not have access to land, and subsequently water rights (see
previous post). Such schemes go beyond subsistence farming but provides women
with an opportunity to participate in economic activities by selling the
vegetables they produce. One particular woman, Sumitra Devi earned 32,000
rupees from farming. When women are earning, they are not financially dependent
on their husbands and so have greater bargaining power in the household (Van
Koppen, 1998).
Another barrier in when it comes to full and active participation
is confidence, especially when speaking public (Mohanty,2002). Through the vegetable farming project women are not only able to participate in farming but also hold group meetings within themselves which gives them a space and time to express their resource needs and build up their knowledge and confidence. One particular quote that is striking from Sumitra is “Before we came together,
we used to not have any confidence or abilities to stand up for ourselves. Now we
are able to talk to anyone: men, women, government, whoever”.
In many resource management schemes, women are often reluctant to participate
in management because they are fearful of speaking in public and people perceived
to be of higher authority – men and government officials, therefore having
women only and women-led management meetings will provide them with a platform to voice their opinions.
Furthermore, while the Lutheran World Relief helps set up the project and
assist in the running but it is sustained by community self-help groups (SCH). So the
women are given the full control of the scheme, so they are not just
participants but managers. The women have set up saving groups within the self-help
groups. They use the credit earned by the savings and revolving SHG to setup
and maintain micro- enterprises for vegetable farming. Therefore, the women are
not fully reliant on their husbands or LWR, therefore further enhancing their confidence and independence.
LWR have replicated similar schemes in other areas, for example shallot
production and marketing in Mali. The project provides women training in not
only the production on high-yield farming practices but also the marketing of
the shallots to maximize the number of sales to increase profit. This resulted
in the production of 209 toms of shallots in over 5 years and an increase in
individual earning from shallot farming from $55 to $300 per growing season
(Lutheran World Relief, 2016).
In conclusion, external actors and organisations can help facilitate
inclusive schemes through effective targeting of poor women who may not
otherwise have access to land and water rights or women who are not already
taking part in economic activities. The external agencies can provide technical
support for example through training and educational material. Such
participation will then help women feel more confident and independent and so
willing and able to take part in community resource management. In addition, these
projects need to allow top level, active participation – they should not be
mere participants but active managers.
Hi Sristi, Very informative post about a successful approach to gender inclusiveness. As this particular project you have discussed has taken place in India, do you think it would be as successful across Africa? What kind of things do you think would need to be taken into consideration in this contrasting social and physical context?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your question Jeannie!
DeleteYes I agree, there are physical and social differences in the two places, however they also share some similarities. Firstly, like in India, according to societal gender norms farming in Africa is seen as a predominantly male practice. Secondly, they share similar legal constraints, land rights and consequently water rights in both places are often provided to men and so restricting women's participation in farming. Of course their physical characteristics might differ considerably, in-terms of precipitation rates and temperatures, so the type of crops used, the farming practices may need to be altered accordingly.
As mentioned above the Lutheran World Relief(LWR) has actually initiated a successful shallot production management in Mali which used similar ideas and techniques. And so demonstrating that such schemes may be replicated in many areas but a thorough research on each area's cultural practice and physical characteristics is necessary.
Hi Sristi! It's great to read about successful initiatives that empower women to run their own farming projects. Do you think such initiatives can be extended to other areas of concern such as women and menstruation? By this I mean teaching women how to maintain personal cleanliness during this period and discussing it openly so that it is no longer considered to be such a taboo subject?
ReplyDeleteHey Yuan! Thank you for your comment.
DeleteYes I think extending such initiatives to menstruation can have a positive impact. However, I disagree that menstruation is no longer considered a taboo subject.Perhaps you have heard about the Nepali girl who died in the a shed fire after being on her period in her house was seen as "impure" (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/12/20/they-banished-their-15-year-old-for-having-her-period-she-died-in-a-cold-nepali-hut/?utm_term=.c6403d23c63c)
While this is an extreme example, in many Muslim countries in Africa such as Nigeria and Sudan, women are often excluded from religious practices when they are menstruating. So, such initiatives can only get maximum results if societal norms and attitudes towards menstruation and female sexual health is tackled.